Notifications
Clear all

Trump sends troops to the 'warzone' of Portland…

 
(@declan-walker)
Noble Member

On Saturday, former President Donald Trump announced plans to send troops into Portland, Oregon, authorizing them to use “full force, if necessary.” He made the move via social media, claiming it was required to protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities and to defend the city—which he described as “war‑ravaged”—against attacks by “antifascists and other domestic terrorists.” 

Trump’s decision was made despite strong objections from state and local leaders, who say the danger is being exaggerated. Oregon Governor Tina Kotek disputed his description of Portland, insisting there is no insurrection, no national security threat, and that local authorities are fully capable of managing public safety. 

Portland’s mayor, Keith Wilson, was even more direct: “The number of necessary troops is zero,” he stated, lamenting that old protest footage—some going back years—was being reused to misrepresent the city’s current state. 

A visit by The Guardian to downtown Portland on Saturday found a calm city. The farmers’ market was active, and the protest near the ICE office was very small—just a few people gathered on a sidewalk. One protester, in a chicken costume draped in an American flag, held a sign reading, “Portland Will Outlive Him.” 

As of now, the White House has not clarified what troops will be deployed, their numbers, or a timeline for action. 

At a news conference the night before, Mayor Wilson expressed concern that federal agents had begun arriving in the city without prior coordination or justification. He suggested the tactic was meant to provoke protests and create footage that aligns with Trump’s portrayal of Portland as lawless. 

Senator Jeff Merkley echoed those doubts, accusing the White House of attempting to manufacture conflict. He pointed to local video evidence showing federal agents using force against a small number of peaceful protesters outside the ICE facility—undermining claims of widespread unrest. 

Though Oregon’s National Guard has not yet been formally requested, federal convoys of agents—some in unmarked vehicles—have already been spotted mobilizing near federal buildings and in neighborhoods where ICE is located. 

Many of Oregon’s congressional leaders, including both U.S. senators and several House members, have criticized Trump’s move as a political stunt and abuse of authority. They argue that the portrayal of Portland as under siege is a narrative tactic to justify unnecessary military intervention in a city that is not facing insurrection. 

Meanwhile, the Pentagon responded by placing 200 Oregon National Guard troops under federal control to support protection of ICE facilities. The state immediately filed a lawsuit claiming the deployment is unlawful and based on exaggerated or false claims. 

Legal experts have flagged potential conflicts with the Posse Comitatus Act, which limits the use of military forces in domestic law enforcement. Although there are exceptions, such as under the Insurrection Act, it remains unclear which legal basis the administration is relying on—and whether it will hold up in court. 

 

Source: The Guardian


Quote
Topic starter Posted : 29/09/2025 12:39 pm